Inaccuracies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gamedungeon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Gamedungeon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===Types=== | |||
# Unrealistic adaptations or mechanics-driven inaccuracies are deviations from what is possible either to make the game richer. | # Unrealistic adaptations or mechanics-driven inaccuracies are deviations from what is possible either to make the game richer. | ||
# Inaccurate adaptations or simplicity-driven inaccuracies are simplifications of the reality for either computational purposes or simply to avoid a ton of micromanagement because this is unfriendly to most players. | # Inaccurate adaptations or simplicity-driven inaccuracies are simplifications of the reality for either computational purposes or simply to avoid a ton of micromanagement because this is unfriendly to most players. | ||
==Inaccuracies== | |||
===Unrealistic adaptations=== | |||
* Color - real cells are clear if they don’t have pigment and are hard to see without dye. | * Color - real cells are clear if they don’t have pigment and are hard to see without dye. | ||
Line 20: | Line 18: | ||
* Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality. | * Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality. | ||
===Inaccurate adaptations=== | |||
* There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful. | * There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful. | ||
* Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim. | * Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim. | ||
* The world for the microbe stage is 2D. | * The world for the microbe stage is 2D. |
Revision as of 02:26, 1 Haziran 2022
While we wish to make the game as accurate as possible, for various reasons some inaccuracies have slipped through the cracks. Here is a list of some of the notable ones.
Types
- Unrealistic adaptations or mechanics-driven inaccuracies are deviations from what is possible either to make the game richer.
- Inaccurate adaptations or simplicity-driven inaccuracies are simplifications of the reality for either computational purposes or simply to avoid a ton of micromanagement because this is unfriendly to most players.
Inaccuracies
Unrealistic adaptations
- Color - real cells are clear if they don’t have pigment and are hard to see without dye.
- Binding Agents - they don’t work like in the game, they get produced in the Golgi Body, get sent right to the membrane, and create an extracellular matrix.
- Toxin makes no physical sense whatsoever. Toxin would not be shot in bolts like that without some dedicated mechanism. In reality, the toxin would just be a cloud, or a directed stream (maybe).
- Proteins should be like specks of dust, in-game they are very big.
- Signaling Agent does not exist. At the very least it doesn’t work like in-game. Ever.
- Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality.
Inaccurate adaptations
- There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful.
- Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim.
- The world for the microbe stage is 2D.