Inaccuracies: Difference between revisions

From Thrive Developer Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
* Toxin makes no physical sense whatsoever. Toxin would not be shot in bolts like that without some dedicated mechanism. In reality, the toxin would just be a cloud, or a directed stream (maybe).
* Toxin makes no physical sense whatsoever. Toxin would not be shot in bolts like that without some dedicated mechanism. In reality, the toxin would just be a cloud, or a directed stream (maybe).
* Proteins should be like specks of dust, in-game they are very big.
* Proteins should be like specks of dust, in-game they are very big.
* Signaling Agent does not exist. At the very least it doesn’t work like in-game. Ever
* Signaling Agent does not exist. At the very least it doesn’t work like in-game. Ever.
* Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality.
* Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality.


Line 24: Line 24:
* There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful.
* There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful.
* Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim.
* Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim.
* The world for the microbe stage is 2D
* The world for the microbe stage is 2D.

Revision as of 02:22, 1 June 2022

While we wish to make the game as accurate as possible, for various reasons some inaccuracies have slipped through the cracks. Here is a list of some of the notable ones.


Types:

  1. Unrealistic adaptations or mechanics-driven inaccuracies are deviations from what is possible either to make the game richer.
  2. Inaccurate adaptations or simplicity-driven inaccuracies are simplifications of the reality for either computational purposes or simply to avoid a ton of micromanagement because this is unfriendly to most players.




Unrealistic adaptations:

  • Color - real cells are clear if they don’t have pigment and are hard to see without dye.
  • Binding Agents - they don’t work like in the game, they get produced in the Golgi Body, get sent right to the membrane, and create an extracellular matrix.
  • Toxin makes no physical sense whatsoever. Toxin would not be shot in bolts like that without some dedicated mechanism. In reality, the toxin would just be a cloud, or a directed stream (maybe).
  • Proteins should be like specks of dust, in-game they are very big.
  • Signaling Agent does not exist. At the very least it doesn’t work like in-game. Ever.
  • Reproduction - the way it works in-game is incorrect and bad and more resemblant of cancer. Mitosis happens all at once in a very controlled fashion in reality.

Inaccurate adaptations:

  • There are tons of microbes in a single place, not a handful.
  • Real evolution algorithms are very sophisticated so Auto Evo isn’t the best representation of an Evo sim.
  • The world for the microbe stage is 2D.